Comparison of plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in terms of urethral stricture rates in patients with comorbidities

dc.authoridBALCI, MUSTAFA BAHADIR CAN/0000-0003-0395-1154;en_US
dc.contributor.authorSinanoğlu, Orhun
dc.contributor.authorEkici, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorBalci, M. B. Can
dc.contributor.authorHazar, A. Ismet
dc.contributor.authorNuhoğlu, Baris
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:37:21Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare urethral stricture rates in comorbid patients undergoing plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate (PK-TURP) and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: The data of 317 patients with comorbidities undergoing either PK-TURP or M-TURP from September 2008 to December 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative 12-month International Prostate Symptom Score, maximal flow rate, postoperative International Index of Erectile Function scores, and urethral stricture rates were evaluated. Results: A total of 154 patients underwent M-TURP and 163 patients underwent PK-TURP. Urethral stricture rates were 6/154 in the M-TURP treatment arm and 17/163 in the PK-TURP treatment arm (P= 0.000). In the presence of hypertension and/or coronary artery disease and/or diabetes mellitus, the risk of urethral stricture complication was significantly higher in the PK-TURP group than in the M-TURP group (P= 0.000). Conclusions: The risk of urethral stricture increases with PK-TURP in elderly patients with a large prostate and concomitant hypertension and/or coronary artery disease and/or diabetes mellitus. Therefore, PK-TURP should be performed cautiously in this group of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12954/PI.14043
dc.identifier.endpage126en_US
dc.identifier.issn2287-8882
dc.identifier.issn2287-903X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25325023en_US
dc.identifier.startpage121en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12954/PI.14043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/6759
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000216583200003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofProstate Internationalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY04101
dc.subjectProstatic Hyperplasiaen_US
dc.subjectComorbidityen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral Resection Of Prostateen_US
dc.subjectUrethral Strictureen_US
dc.titleComparison of plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in terms of urethral stricture rates in patients with comorbiditiesen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar