Comparison of uterine artery blood flow with levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-3166-9052en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8682-5027en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-4627-8628en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-2802-7793en_US
dc.contributor.authorHaliloglu, Berna
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Aygen
dc.contributor.authorIlter, Erdin
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Serpil
dc.contributor.authorOzekici, Umit
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:46:03Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:46:03Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.departmentMaltepe Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: As a contraceptive method, we investigated whether the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has any effect on uterine artery blood flow when compared with copper intrauterine device (IUD). Study Design: Sixty women with copper IUD and 60 women with LNG-IUS were included in the study. The age, gravidity, parity, body mass index (HMI) and menstrual flow pattern using a pictorial chart were recorded. All women were assessed by ultrasonography at the preinsertion period and 1 year after insertion. The pulsatility and resistance indices (PI and RI, respectively) of the uterine artery and endometrial thickness were evaluated in the preinsertion and postinsertion periods. Results: In copper IUD users, preinsertion and postinsertion ultrasonographic assessments were not significantly different. However, postinsertion RI was significantly higher compared with preinsertion RI in LNG-IUS users (p=.001). The PI was also increased 1 year after insertion, but it did not reach statistically significant levels (p=.08). Endometrial thickness was also significantly decreased in the postinsertion period in women with LNG-IUS (p=.04). Conclusion: The significant increase in uterine artery RI in LNG-IUS users 1 year after insertion might be due to its local progestational effects. It might also indicate the mechanism of the LNG-IUS in reducing menstrual blood flow. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.contraception.2010.09.001
dc.identifier.endpage581en_US
dc.identifier.issn0010-7824
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21570557en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79955940158en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage578en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2010.09.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/7874
dc.identifier.volume83en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000291176800014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCONTRACEPTIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY00563
dc.subjectIntrauterine deviceen_US
dc.subjectLNG-IUSen_US
dc.subjectDoppleren_US
dc.subjectPulsatility indexen_US
dc.subjectResistance indexen_US
dc.titleComparison of uterine artery blood flow with levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine deviceen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu