Bilateral Mutifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation on an Postoperative Hyperopic Patient

dc.contributor.authorTunç, Z.
dc.contributor.authorErcalik, Yeşim
dc.contributor.authorSencan, Sadik
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:38:02Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:38:02Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Presentation of our bilateral multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation results on an bilateral postoperative hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) patient. Material-Methods: In April 2007, a female, 10 year- postoperative bilateral hyperopic LASIK patient was implanted by the same surgeon with bilateral multifocal IOLs following a facoemulsification operation, because she had developed cataract. Patients preoperative and postoperative visual acuities (distance, near and intermediate on both Snellen and Jaeger charts), corneal topography, keratometry values and postoperative contrast sensitivity results were followed up. Power of the IOL was calculated according to clinical narrative method. Patient was also asked questions regarding her quality of life, light reflections and personal satisfaction. Results: 70 year old female subject had received hyperopic LASIK treatment 10 years ago (OD: +3.75 D; OS: +3.50 -0.50 90 D). After cataract has developed, in April 2007, patient received bilateral multifocal IOL implantation following facoemulsification surgery. Right eye received a refractive IOL, while left eye received an aspheric diffractive IOL. At 2 months postoperative, uncorrected visual acuities were as follows; distant 0.8 and 1.0, near J3 and J1, intermediate J5 and J3. Postoperative best corrected visual acuities were as follows; distant 1.0 and 1.0, near J1 and J1, intermediate J2 and J1. At 2 months, postoperative refraction values were -0.75 D for the right eye and +0.00 for the left eye. Contrast sensitivity tests were conducted at 4th, 6th months and 1 year postop and improvement was observed. Patient noted the glare problems were diminishing by day. Overall satisfaction was rated as good. Conclusion: Our bilateral hyperopic LASIK patient was satisfied following the bilateral multifocal IOL implantation. Although the result is encouraging, further studies on more subjects are needed for proving the effectiveness and safety of the technique.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage136en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0659
dc.identifier.issn2147-2661
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage133en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/7038
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000219170800009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTurkish Ophthalmological Socen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Oftalmoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY04419
dc.subjectLasiken_US
dc.subjectFacoemulsificationen_US
dc.subjectMultifocal Iolen_US
dc.titleBilateral Mutifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation on an Postoperative Hyperopic Patienten_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar