Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments: Baha-5 vs Ponto-plus

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-7914-2201en_US
dc.contributor.authorKara, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorGüven, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Mahmut Sinan
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorAdigul, Çağlayan
dc.contributor.authorDurgut, Merve
dc.contributor.authorElden, Halil
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorİşeri, Mete
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Deniz
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:00:28Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:00:28Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: To our knowledge, there is no study comparing Ponto Plus® (Oticon Medical AB, Askim, Sweden) and Baha® 5 (Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AG, Mölnlycke, Sweden) available in the literature. Aims/objectives: The primary aim was to compare the performance of the Baha 5 with the Ponto Plus device in terms of speech understanding in quiet and in noise. In addition, to determine statistically whether or not the difference between the abutment systems created any variation in terms of skin reaction. Materials and methods: Twenty bone-anchored hearing instrument users, ten in each group, were evaluated for speech understanding in quiet and several signal-to-noise ratios using the Turkish Matrix Test in a two-speaker setup. The Holger classifications were also reviewed to determine adverse skin reactions. Results: It was revealed that the hearing results of both devices were similar and, when the skin reactions were compared, there was no statistically significant difference between the two-implant systems. Conclusions and significance: Because of the similar results of the groups, it can be interpreted as the key different device features such as the size, weight, colour alternatives, and the ease of use of the devices might be important in terms of device preference.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKara, A., Güven, M., Yılmaz, M.S., Demir, D., Adigul, Ç., Durgut, M., Elden, H., Mutlu, F. ve İşeri, M. (2019). Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments: Baha-5 vs Ponto-plus. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Taylor & Francis Online. 139(6), s. 517-521.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage521en_US
dc.identifier.issn1651-2251
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage517en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00016489.2019.1590637
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/3382
dc.identifier.volume139en_US
dc.institutionauthorDemir, Deniz
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Onlineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Oto-Laryngologicaen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/00016489.2019.1590637en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryUluslararası Hakemli Dergide Makale - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY00068
dc.subjectHearing aiden_US
dc.subjectnoiseen_US
dc.subjectbone conduction hearingen_US
dc.subjectspeech intelligibilityen_US
dc.titleComparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments: Baha-5 vs Ponto-plusen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu