Ozil IP torsional mode versus combined torsional/longitudinal microcoaxial phacoemulsification

dc.authorid0000-0002-6902-4460en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2918-1816en_US
dc.contributor.authorHelvacioglu, Firat
dc.contributor.authorTunc, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorYeter, Celal
dc.contributor.authorOguzhan, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorSencan, Sadik
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:46:41Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:46:41Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.departmentMaltepe Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. To compare the safety and efficacy of microcoaxial phacoemulsification surgeries performed with the Ozil Intelligent Phaco (IP) torsional mode and combined torsional/longitudinal ultrasound (US) mode using the Infiniti Vision System (Alcon Laboratories). METHODS. In this prospective randomized comparative study, 60 eyes were assigned to 2.2-mm microcoaxial phacoemulsification using the Ozil IP torsional mode (group 1) or combined torsional/longitudinal US mode (group 2). The primary outcome measures were US time (UST), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), longitudinal and torsional ultrasound amplitudes, mean operation time, mean volume of balanced salt solution (BSS) used, and surgical complications. RESULTS. Both groups included 30 eyes. Mean UST, CDE, and longitudinal and torsional ultrasound amplitudes in group 1 were 1 minute 15 +/- 34.33 seconds, 8.74 +/- 5.64, 0.43 +/- 0.74, and 25.56 +/- 8.56, respectively, and these parameters in group 2 were 1 minute 40 +/- 51.44 seconds, 9.28 +/- 5.99, 3.64 +/- 1.55, and 3.71 +/- 1.34, respectively. UST and longitudinal amplitudes were found to be significantly low in group 1 (p<0.001, p<0.001), whereas torsional amplitude was found to be significantly high in this group (p=0.001). Mean volumes of BSS used in groups 1 and 2 were 63.30 +/- 18.00 cc and 84.50 +/- 28.65 cc, respectively (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS. The Ozil IP torsional mode may provide more effective lens removal than the combined torsional/longitudinal US mode with a lower UST and volume of BSS used.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5301/ejo.5000136
dc.identifier.endpage942en_US
dc.identifier.issn1120-6721
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22427146en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84867773601en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage936en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000136
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/7954
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000312043200010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWICHTIG EDITOREen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY00866
dc.subjectOzil IPen_US
dc.subjectTorsional phacoemulsificationen_US
dc.titleOzil IP torsional mode versus combined torsional/longitudinal microcoaxial phacoemulsificationen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar