Outcomes of torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification using tips with 30-degree and 45-degree aperture angles

dc.authorid0000-0002-6902-4460en_US
dc.contributor.authorHelvacioglu, Firat
dc.contributor.authorSencan, Sadik
dc.contributor.authorYeter, Celal
dc.contributor.authorTunc, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorUyar, O. Murat
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:50:24Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:50:24Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.departmentMaltepe Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of Ozil Intelligent Phaco torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification surgeries performed using 30-degree and 45-degree aperture angled tips. SETTING: Maltepe University School of Medicine Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Eyes were assigned to 2.2 mm microcoaxial phacoemulsification using the torsional mode with a 45-degree (Group 1) or 30-degree (Group 2) aperture angled tip. A quick-chop surgical technique was used. The primary outcome measures were ultrasound time (UST), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), longitudinal and torsional ultrasound (US) amplitudes, mean surgical time, mean balanced salt solution volume used, and mean central corneal thickness (CCT) changes. RESULTS: The mean UST, CDE, and longitudinal and torsional US amplitudes were 58.21 seconds +/- 33.81 (SD), 7.74 +/- 6.23, 0.45 +/- 0.30, and 26.30 +/- 12.60 in Group 1 and 63.83 +/- 23.42 seconds, 12.36 +/- 6.75, 0.23 +/- 0.26, and 44.65 +/- 14.38 in Group 2, respectively. The mean CDE and torsional amplitudes were significantly lower in Group 1 (P=.002 and P=.001, respectively). The mean balanced salt solution volume was 73.30 +/- 19.87 cc in Group 1 and 74.30 +/- 19.44 cc in Group 2 (P=.821). The mean CCT change was 52.40 +/- 38.08 mu m and 99.35 +/- 47.14 mu m, respectively (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Torsional phacoemulsification performed with a 45-degree aperture angled tip provided more effective lens removal with a lower CDE and less CCT change than a 30-degree aperture angled tip.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.051
dc.identifier.endpage368en_US
dc.identifier.issn0886-3350
dc.identifier.issn1873-4502
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24440105en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84896740035en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.051
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/8155
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000333542800005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY01827
dc.titleOutcomes of torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification using tips with 30-degree and 45-degree aperture anglesen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar