Comparison of polyacrylonitrile-and polypyrrole-based electrochemical sensors for detection of propamocarb in food samples
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-0456-2962 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-6788-1605 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Karakuş, Selcan | |
dc.contributor.author | Taşaltın, Cihat | |
dc.contributor.author | Gürol, İlke | |
dc.contributor.author | Akkurt, Barbaros | |
dc.contributor.author | Baytemir, Gülsen | |
dc.contributor.author | Taşaltın, Nevin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-12T20:58:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-12T20:58:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_US |
dc.department | Fakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Elektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Food safety is a crucial issue; all countries have struggled against pesticides for years. In this study, Polypyrrole (PPy)- and Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors were investigated to detect the pesticide propamocarb (PM) in food samples. Under the experimental conditions, the proposed strategy exhibited a high selectivity of the disposable PPy-based and PANbased sensors for the determination of propamocarb pesticide in the concentration of 1 ?M with a rapid detection within 1 min at pH 7.4 and 25 °C. We demonstrated the detection of PM residues on cucumber and tomato samples with good electrochemical performances towards the real-time usability on real food samples. PAN-based non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor has good sensitivity, higher selectivity, and stability than PPy-based non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor. The prepared PAN-based nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor is a potential candidate to be used in devices which perform food safety in agricultural products. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Karakuş S., Taşaltın C., Gürol İ., Akkurt B., Baytemir G. and Taşaltın N.(2022). Comparison of polyacrylonitrile-and polypyrrole-based electrochemical sensors for detection of propamocarb in food samples. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society, Section A: Chemistry. 9(3), s.801–808. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18596/jotcsa.1087096. | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 808 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 801 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 1116436 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.prg/10.18596/jotcsa.1087096. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/3214 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | |
dc.institutionauthor | Baytemir, Gülsen | |
dc.institutionauthor | Taşaltın, Nevin | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Turkish Chemical Society | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society, Section A: Chemistry | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Ulusal Hakemli Dergide Makale - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.snmz | KY02073 | |
dc.subject | Food safety | en_US |
dc.subject | Pesticide | en_US |
dc.subject | Electrochemical sensor | en_US |
dc.subject | Polypyrrole | en_US |
dc.subject | Polyacrylonitrile | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of polyacrylonitrile-and polypyrrole-based electrochemical sensors for detection of propamocarb in food samples | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |